What is an HL7 Interface and Why is It Still the Standard in Healthcare Interoperability? 

HL7 Interface Standards Continue to Power Healthcare Data Sharing

“The report of my death was an exaggeration.” – HL7v2. Wait. That was actually Mark Twain in a letter to a New York reporter. But it also applies to the Health Level 7 (HL7) healthcare interface standard.

The fact is, HL7v2 remains the most widely used healthcare interface standard by a large margin. HL7.org tells us that:

  • 95% of U.S. healthcare organizations use HL7v2 interface standards
  • More than 35 countries have HL7 interface implementations

So while the most excited healthcare interoperability buzz focuses on FHIR (itself an HL7 evolution), the HL7 interface standard powers most current data sharing in healthcare.

Let’s take a closer look at the HL7 interface standard and how your organization can advance interoperability with existing HL7 implementations while balancing other data exchange capabilities and future technologies.

Quick History of the HL7 Interface Standard

Quick History of the HL7 Interface Standard

In the early 1980s, physicians and providers “interoperated” with phone calls, faxes, and paper forms. Many healthcare software vendors built expensive individual interfaces to exchange data with other individual healthcare systems and data sources. These interfaces took tons of work to build and maintain but created just one closed data-sharing tunnel at a time.

Health Level 7 International set out to fix things. The nonprofit organization was formed in 1987 with a mission to create harmony and common data interface standards for rapidly growing EHR and healthcare information technologies. The idea: Common interface standards and data formats would reconcile the unwieldy, disconnected universe of EHRs and other health data to accelerate integration and improve care and outcomes. 

Over time the HL7 interface standards have largely succeeded in helping healthcare providers and technology organizations:

  • Ensure uniform EHR data for a consistent, complete patient view
  • Automate workflows by reducing and eliminating manual data entry
  • Help exchange health reporting electronically with regulators 
  • Open digital health records and data access for patients
  • Reduce investments in new technology upgrades by building on a common standard

HL7 Interface Versions and Releases

HL7 Versions and Releases

Here’s a quick summary of major HL7 versions and releases:

HL7v1

HL7 published the draft, proof-of-concept version 1 standard in 1987. It mapped out the overall structure of the interfaces, ADT, order entry, and display-oriented queries. The organization used the standard for demonstrations, operational experience, and industry input. The HL7 team did not intend to seek accreditation or production implementation for HL7v1.

HL7v2

CTA

Things got real with HL7v2. HL7 released version 2.0 in October 1988, the first release that saw limited production. The most current release is HL7v2.9, with a few sub-releases along the way. Notably, each iterative 2.x release is compatible with previous ones. 

HL7v2 introduced key interoperability advances:

  • Support of most common global healthcare interfaces
  • A framework for accommodating things that are not part of the standard
  • Lower implementation costs

Most HL7 message exchanges today use the specifications in versions 2.3 and 2.31. 

HL7v3

First released in 2005, the HL7v3 interface standard was an entirely new, more precise standard meant to increase adoption, define a consistent data model, and avoid legacy issues. For reasons we’ll discuss further below, the industry has resisted the adoption of the now largely irrelevant HL7v3 interface standard.

The Interoperability Path Forward: HL7v2, HL7v3, and FHIR

The Interoperability Path Forward: HL7v2, HL7v3, and FHIR

These questions and answers clarify the sometimes bumpy progression forward from the popular HL7v2 interface standard:

Why Not Just Stick with HL7v2 Interface?

HL7v2 is ubiquitous and successful. Why can’t healthcare settle on it as the interface and integration standard of the future?

As much as HL7v2 has advanced interoperability, it has several limitations:

  • It can be hard to implement.
  • It only handles structured data, not unstructured data such as images and static documents.
  • Developers have a steep learning curve with HL7v2 as they are more familiar with REST, JSON, XML, and other web-based tools and technologies.
  • The HL7 pre-web technology foundation has reached its ceiling for advancement.

HL7v2 has and will continue to do a lot of interoperability heavy lifting in healthcare. But it’s not the direction for the future.

Why Did HL7v3 Interface Stumble? 

HL7v3 promised to improve the limitations of HL7v2 data modeling and standards variation. Its good intentions hit some significant stumbling blocks:

  • I was not backward compatible with HL7v2, which meant organizations had to implement and maintain v3 solutions alongside existing v2 solutions. 
  • Version 3 interfaces typically could not communicate with v2 interfaces. 
  • It is complex and difficult to implement with too little return for the effort.

Advance to HL7 FHIR—What Interface Gaps Does FHIR Close?

As HL7v3 stalled, innovators on the HL7 team shifted to a future vision: Incorporate widely used web standards and protocols such as REST, JSON, and XML to make interface development and implementation easier. That became the FHIR standard, first released in 2014. 

FHIR has advanced three critical components of healthcare data interoperability that previous interface standards could not address:

  • Solve Unstructured Data Exchange: FHIR lets systems share structured and unstructured data, closing the most critical interoperability gap. 
  • Build Interfaces Faster and Easier:  Developers have more experience with more modern API technologies (RESTful protocol,  choice of JSON, XML, or RDF for representing data), making FHIR interface standards easier to learn and APIs easier to develop and implement.
  • Introduce Resources to Make Better, More Intuitive Sense of Data: The FHIR interface standard introduced resources, data categories that represent concepts such as patients, lab results, insurance claims, appointments, and more to make interfaces more flexible and development more intuitive.

And the 21st Century Cures Act and final rules from the Centers for Medicare Services (CMS) now mandate FHIR interface adoption by most every healthcare organization. We have and will continue to educate and guide success in EHR integration and data sharing with FHIR. 

KMS Healthcare: Make HL7 Part of Your Harmonious Integration Model

KMS Healthcare: Make HL7 Part of Your Harmonious Integration Model

Even with FHIR and other future technology options, HL7 will remain a cornerstone of healthcare interoperability for years or even decades to come. Other interface and data sharing formats also comprise an additional important part of the healthcare integration mix for most organizations, including EDI, flat files, web services, and continuity of care records (CCRs). And there are many other use-specific interface and message formats for imaging, pharmaceuticals, labs, orders, and other healthcare events and information.

That’s why you need a technology partner with elite experience and understanding of the entire healthcare integration universe, including HL7. 

That’s KMS Healthcare. Partner with us to establish a harmonious integration model to get the most valuable, productive real-time data sharing across all of your systems. 

Partner with KMS Healthcare to:

  • Determine everywhere in your IT landscape that HL7 interfaces power integration
  • Develop strategies and apply tools to test and tune your existing HL7 integration points
  • Get the right, consistent, and comprehensive EHR data to patients, doctors, payers, and billers 
  • Forge a strong strategy for incorporating FHIR and SMART on FHIR technologies
  • Start implementing FHIR APIs rapidly and strategically with KMS Connect 
  • Stay ahead of CMS deadlines for FHIR and SMART on FHIR adoption and compliance
  • Assess, test, and tune other critical data exchange systems and formats across your organization, including EDI, flat file exchange, web services, and more.

Speak a shared language among health data systems, wearables and other remote devices, claims systems, patient-provided data and ePRo, patient portals, and every point of care and communication across the patient journey. Establish confident optimum integration performance today and a smart, smooth path forward to better and better interoperability in the future.

CTA

Click to start your path to integration harmony with KMS Healthcare…

Get The Latest In Healthcare Straight To Your Inbox

Other Posts You Might Be Interested in

Types of Healthcare Data: A Comprehensive Overview
Explore the different types of healthcare data and...
Data Loss Prevention in Healthcare: The Ultimate Security Guide
Protect sensitive patient data with our comprehensive...
Denial Management in Healthcare: All You Need to Know
Explore the importance, strategies, and industry best...
Cloud Security in Healthcare: Strategic Approaches to Protect Your Data
Discover effective strategies for ensuring comprehensive...
Digital Trends in Healthcare Technology: What Comes Next in 2024?
Discover the hottest digital trends in healthcare for...

Confidently Cast Your Healthcare Technology Strategies with KMS Healthcare Consulting

Work smarter toward greater results by partnering with the KMS Healthcare Technology Consulting team—start today.